<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Safe Harbor Internet Services &#187; Visual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://safeharborinternet.com/tag/visual/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://safeharborinternet.com</link>
	<description>Psalm 107:30 - &#34;What a blessing was that stillness as he brought them safely into harbor!&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Quality vs. Appearance</title>
		<link>http://safeharborinternet.com/web-design</link>
		<comments>http://safeharborinternet.com/web-design#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Norwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Relevance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safeharborinternet.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have seen them &#8230; slick websites that are visually appealing but you don&#8217;t really know what the site is about. You&#8217;ve also seen sites that are not very visually appealing but you keep coming back over and over. What is more important &#8230; visual appeal or content appeal?
The visually perfect site might attract lots [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have seen them &#8230; slick websites that are visually appealing but you don&#8217;t really know what the site is about. You&#8217;ve also seen sites that are not very visually appealing but you keep coming back over and over. What is more important &#8230; visual appeal or content appeal?</p>
<p>The visually perfect site might attract lots of attention because it is just pleasant to look at. But if the content is poor or low-quality will you keep coming back? If a site has a high level of quality information but is not as visually stunning will you keep coming back? I would argue that the site with the quality material is far better than the visually stunning site with poor quality.</p>
<p>You can of course have both, but if you have to have a site that is stunning visually make sure that your content is at the same level of attractiveness. Focus on quality and relevance and you will get many more visitors and potentially many more customers!</p>
<a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/digg?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsafeharborinternet.com%2Fweb-design&amp;linkname=Quality%20vs.%20Appearance" title="Digg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://safeharborinternet.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/digg.png" alt="Digg"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsafeharborinternet.com%2Fweb-design&amp;linkname=Quality%20vs.%20Appearance" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://safeharborinternet.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/facebook.png" alt="Facebook"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/reddit?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsafeharborinternet.com%2Fweb-design&amp;linkname=Quality%20vs.%20Appearance" title="Reddit" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://safeharborinternet.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/reddit.png" alt="Reddit"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsafeharborinternet.com%2Fweb-design&amp;linkname=Quality%20vs.%20Appearance" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://safeharborinternet.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/twitter.png" alt="Twitter"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsafeharborinternet.com%2Fweb-design&amp;linkname=Quality%20vs.%20Appearance" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://safeharborinternet.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" alt="LinkedIn"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/delicious?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsafeharborinternet.com%2Fweb-design&amp;linkname=Quality%20vs.%20Appearance" title="Delicious" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://safeharborinternet.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/delicious.png" alt="Delicious"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/plaxo_pulse?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsafeharborinternet.com%2Fweb-design&amp;linkname=Quality%20vs.%20Appearance" title="Plaxo Pulse" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://safeharborinternet.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/plaxo.png" alt="Plaxo Pulse"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/printfriendly?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsafeharborinternet.com%2Fweb-design&amp;linkname=Quality%20vs.%20Appearance" title="PrintFriendly" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://safeharborinternet.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/printfriendly.png" alt="PrintFriendly"/></a> <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsafeharborinternet.com%2Fweb-design&amp;linkname=Quality%20vs.%20Appearance"><img src="http://safeharborinternet.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://safeharborinternet.com/web-design/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
